Skip to main content
VOICES FROM THE GLOBAL SOUTH ON FOOD, CLIMATE AND CULTURE
POWERED BY OVER 100 CONTRIBUTING WRITERS
local market in zaria with fresh produce and vendors

Precision agriculture narrows Africa’s digital divide on farms

Spraying drones and data-driven tools are spreading among African smallholders, cutting labour costs, though financing and connectivity gaps persist.

By
Staff Writer
September 18, 2026
4 min read

Precision agriculture tools, from spraying drones to soil-sensing apps, are spreading faster among African smallholder farmers than two years ago. Trade coverage of the continent’s agritech sector this month confirms the trend. The shift is easing some of the labour and input costs that have long weighed on small farms. Analysts caution that financing gaps and patchy rural connectivity still limit how far the technology can reach.

Spraying drones illustrate the trend most visibly. Farmers who use drone services to apply pesticides and fertiliser report faster application and lower chemical exposure than manual spraying. That is according to coverage of drone-service providers operating across several African markets. Many smallholders previously relied on manual knapsack sprayers, often working through several hectares by hand. For them, the labour savings alone can be substantial during the narrow windows when pest or disease pressure demands rapid action.

The broader precision agriculture push extends beyond drones. It also includes soil-testing tools, satellite-based crop monitoring and mobile applications that give farmers localised weather and planting advice. These tools aim to close a long-standing information gap. Smallholders across much of the continent have historically had far less access than large commercial operations to this data. It informs decisions on when to plant, irrigate or apply inputs, decisions that can determine whether a season is profitable or a loss.

Aerial view of green farmland
Photo by Tim Oun on Unsplash

Access remains uneven across Africa

Access to precision tools is concentrated where mobile networks are strongest and where farmer cooperatives can pool the cost of drone services. It also depends on financing that can bridge the gap between a technology’s upfront cost and the delayed returns it generates over a season. Farmers in more remote regions, or those without the credit history to access financing, remain largely outside this shift. That means the productivity gains are not yet evenly distributed across the smallholder population precision agriculture is meant to serve.

Continental bodies and development finance institutions have named digital agriculture a priority for closing Africa’s yield gap. That gap is the persistent difference between the yields African farmers currently achieve and what the same land could produce. Better information and inputs make the difference between the two. Earlier market assessments put the continent’s digital agriculture potential in the billions of dollars. That figure reflects both unmet demand and the difficulty of building the infrastructure needed to realise it.

The stakes are tied to food security trends elsewhere on the continent. Nigeria’s recent easing of food inflation shows how directly farm-level productivity feeds through to consumer prices. A strong harvest reaching markets drove much of that improvement (see related story). Wider adoption of precision tools could help stabilise that link, proponents argue, by cutting the crop losses and input waste that currently erode smallholder yields. Turning this trend into a continent-wide shift will still depend on financing models and rural infrastructure that remain works in progress.

local market in zaria with fresh produce and vendors
Photo by Vurzie Kim on Pexels.com

Paying only for what is used

Cooperative and pay-as-you-go models are emerging as one route around the financing barrier. Rather than requiring individual farmers to buy a drone or sensor outright, several service providers now offer per-hectare spraying or monitoring contracts. Smallholders pay only for the service used on a given plot in a season. That structure lowers the upfront cost that has kept precision tools out of reach for farmers cultivating a few hectares. It still depends on a provider operating within reasonable travelling distance, which remains uneven across rural areas.

Training and trust are less visible constraints. Farmers have relied on manual methods built up over years of experience. They are not always quick to hand decisions on input timing or dosage to a sensor or an app. That is especially true when the technology comes from companies with a limited track record in the region. Extension services are the government-run advisory networks that have traditionally taught farmers new techniques. They are increasingly being asked to add precision agriculture literacy to their existing programmes, though funding has not kept pace with the technology.

THE FOURTH PLATE IS PUBLISHED BY GLOBAL SOUTH MEDIA PVT LTD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, INDIA