As our jeep curved through the forests of Ranni in Kerala, I noticed something unusual. A towering tree stood by the bend, its trunk wrapped with cloth. In front of it, a small man-made platform held oil lamps — remnants of recent offerings.
In the excitement, I forgot to identify the species.
But this tree wasn’t just a botanical specimen. It was revered. Locals call it a “Pay-kavu” — kavu meaning sacred grove. “Pay” is variously glossed by locals; some link it to spirit-presence in the Tamil-Malayalam continuum, which feels apt for a place held apart by taboo and attention. Perhaps that’s fitting. The place carried a quiet sense of presence.

In an age defined by the Anthropocene — where human dominance reshapes ecosystems — this was a powerful reminder of another worldview. A time when ecocentrism and biocentrism guided human behavior. When nature wasn’t a resource to extract from, but a life force to respect.
Across cultures, nature worship has existed in countless forms. Perhaps it wasn’t superstition, but indigenous wisdom — an intuitive understanding of interdependence.
Kerala’s kavus preserve that intuition in living practice: serpent groves where entry is limited and leaf litter is left untouched; mother-goddess shrines where even deadwood is taken only for ritual fires. The rule is simple: the grove is not for us, we are for the grove.

On other journeys, the pattern repeats. En route to Idamalakudy, wayside stones daubed with turmeric and kumkum sit beneath old trees — “stone gods” marking a pact between people and place.
Cross into Tamil Nadu and the roadside grammar is the same: a rough stone becomes a deity by attention and offering; a wayside pipal becomes a temple by being left alone. Before a wall is built, sanctity is already in force.
To dismiss this as “mere animism” is to miss its metaphysics. Three ideas are at work:
Presence: that certain places are not empty, but already occupied — by serpent, mother, ancestor, or simply a more-than-human order. Sanctity signals occupancy.
Reciprocity: that beings and places give and take. A lamp is an acknowledgement that the balance must not be left returned.
Inversion of mastery: that wisdom begins by limiting human will. A taboo is a way to keep the spring clean, the soil cool, the canopy intact.
Ancient texts keep returning to trees and groves to teach this inversion. The Bhagavad Gita begins its fifteenth chapter with an image that bends our perspective:
“There is an imperishable Ashvattha tree with its roots above and its branches down; its leaves are the Vedic hymns; he who knows this tree is the knower of the Vedas.” (Bhagavad Gita 15.1).
If the roots are above, we are not the source; we live on what descends.
The Atharva Veda’s Hymn to the Earth makes the ethic practical: “Whatever I dig from you, O Earth, let that quickly grow again, O Purifier; may we not injure your vitals or your heart” (Atharva Veda 12.1.35, tr. Griffith).
Between cosmic interpretations and daily restraint lies a complete code.
The kavus — whether serpent groves or mother-shrines — and the wayside stone-gods sprinkled with turmeric powder and vermillion, operationalize that code.
Community rules do what law often cannot: they keep hands off. In some kavus, entry is timed to the ritual calendar; in others, litter stays where it falls. The result is ecological as much as theological: soil stays spongy, water lingers, snakes have refuge and trees protect.

Seen this way, the lamps at Ranni, the stone gods near Edamalakudy, the turmeric-dusted wayside shrines in Tamil Nadu are not folk leftovers but instruments of care.
A cloth at the girth stands as a boundary; a smear of vermillion is a sign that someone is watching and a taboo is a restraint that travels with you – out of respect for space and nature. Nothing more. Nothing less.
That single tree in Ranni adorned with offerings, symbolizes something hopeful: that reverence for nature still survives. And maybe, in small sacred acts like these, lies a path back to balance.
We may not all sing to serpent gods or light lamps at banyans. But we can learn the message: name a place as more than ours; bind ourselves to its well-being and accept limits as a form of knowledge.

Dr. Gopakumar S is the Dean of Faculty of Forestry at Kerala Agricultural University. His research and teaching have centered around forest and individual plant ecology, while his broader interests include the social dimensions of tropical forest management and the value addition of Black Dammar and its biomolecules. He is also passionate about using technology as a tool for ecological problem-solving. Follow him on LinkedIn






Leave a Reply